RFQ & Quote Tools
Supplier Reply and Open-Question Tracker
When a supplier answers only part of a question, record the exact reply and the missing information instead of treating silence as acceptance. One numbered row per question creates a usable decision record across quotations, sample changes, production and payment.
What this page helps you decide
Use the tracker to decide whether an answer is complete enough for the next decision gate, what evidence is still required and when a critical unresolved point should be clarified, escalated, paused or used to replace a supplier.
An unanswered question is not accepted by default. “Yes,” “No problem” and “We can do it” are not evidence-based confirmations unless the reply identifies what is being confirmed and, where needed, connects it to a quotation, specification, sample or document.
Unified supplier question tracker
Copy the table into a spreadsheet or use the downloadable CSV. Preserve the supplier's exact wording; put interpretation and missing information in separate columns.
| Supplier | Product/project | Question ID | Original question | Supplier's exact reply | Status | Missing information | Evidence required | Decision gate | Owner | Due date | Escalation level | Closure evidence | Buyer closure confirmation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier A | Product / version | Q-01 | Unanswered | Quotation comparison | Clarification |
Status options: Answered; Partial; Unanswered; Contradictory; Cannot provide; Pending internal confirmation.
Decision gates: Quotation comparison; Sample approval; Production approval; Shipment approval; Payment release; Non-blocking.
Escalation levels: Clarification; Organisational escalation; Pause; Replace supplier.
How to process incomplete replies
- Give each original question a separate ID. Do not combine product, price, compliance and delivery questions in one row.
- Copy the exact reply, including conditions such as quantity, model, packaging version or “need to check.”
- Assign a status. Allow “Cannot provide” or “Pending internal confirmation” instead of forcing a premature yes or no.
- State the missing information and the evidence needed to close the question.
- Assign the decision gate. A critical point must close before the related irreversible step proceeds.
- Send only the numbered unanswered or partial questions again. Do not resend the whole original email and make the supplier find them.
Status and closure rules
| Status | Use when | Closure rule |
|---|---|---|
| Answered | The reply addresses the whole numbered question for the relevant product and condition | Record the answer source and buyer closure confirmation |
| Partial | Some requested fields or conditions are missing | List only the missing parts in the follow-up |
| Unanswered | No usable answer was provided | Resend the numbered question and retain the original due date history |
| Contradictory | Two records or replies conflict | Identify both sources and request a controlling answer or revised document |
| Cannot provide | The supplier states that the information or evidence cannot be supplied | Decide whether the related gate can proceed without it; do not relabel it as answered |
| Pending internal confirmation | The supplier needs input from production, engineering, finance or another team | Assign an owner and due date; keep the gate open |
After a sample review
Give every requested change its own question ID and link it to the sample identifier, review date, affected specification or artwork revision and required closure evidence. A revised message does not close the change until the buyer confirms which evidence controls production.
Use the Sample Review and Change Log for the sample observation and revision history, then carry every unresolved change into this tracker with the decision gate set to “Production approval.”
A concise follow-up message
Thank you for your reply. The questions below are still open or only partly answered. Please reply under each question ID. If you cannot confirm an item, need to check internally or cannot provide the requested evidence, please state that directly.
Example — Q-03: Does the quoted MOQ apply to the total order or to each colour?
Current reply: “MOQ is 1,000 units.”
Still needed: MOQ basis and whether colours may be mixed.
Needed before: Quotation comparison.
Please reply by the agreed quotation-review date.
Escalation and pause boundaries
- Clarification: resend the numbered missing point once, with the required evidence and decision gate.
- Organisational escalation: if the issue remains open, ask the sales contact to involve the responsible production, engineering, quality, finance or management owner.
- Pause: do not pass the relevant sample, production, shipment or payment gate while a critical question is unanswered, contradictory or unsupported.
- Replace supplier: consider an alternative when the supplier repeatedly avoids a critical question, cannot provide evidence essential to the decision or changes the relevant entity or product basis without an adequate explanation.
These are commercial information controls, not a legal finding about the supplier. A clear “cannot provide” may be more decision-useful than repeated vague assurance.
Related next steps
- First Supplier Enquiry Checklist
- Quote Comparison Template
- How to Identify the Legal Entity Behind a Chinese Supplier Website
- What to Confirm Before Sending a Deposit to a Chinese Supplier
- Research Services
- Start Here for Buyers
If a critical entity, document or quotation conflict cannot be resolved from the supplier's reply alone, Research Services can organise the available sources and define the remaining evidence gap.